Protect Your Voice - Stand For Equal Rights of Citizen Journalists. Bloggers are Bringing you MORE of the Real Story. Bloggers SHOULD have Equal Rights as Journalists when Bloggers are Doing the Same Things. Bloggers Rights. Freedom of Speech, Equality for ALL. Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity.

Thursday, February 23, 2012



"Jason Stverak, president of the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity, recently wrote a Washington Examiner op-ed regarding the free speech threats which bloggers and other citizen journalists increasingly face.

This past December, federal judge Marco Hernandez of Oregon issued a ruling in the libel trial of Obsidian Finance Group v. Cox that has dangerous First Amendment implications.
Hernandez ruled that blogger Crystal Cox was not entitled to the same protection under media shield laws that other members of the press enjoy. This ruling made it easy for a jury to find her guilty of libel. That result threatens the First Amendment rights of all citizen-journalists.
With the Internet increasingly serving as the dominant source of information, a national debate has been taking place asking the question, who is a journalist? Legal scholars, journalism academics and First Amendment advocates all have their opinions and as expected, there is little agreement.
But why is this issue so complicated? Bloggers, like all citizens of the United States, have First Amendment rights. Has the definition of a journalist changed? Or has perception and therefore legal definition simply not adjusted to modern technology?
According to Professor Kyu Ho Youm of the University of Oregon School of Journalism and Communication, Judge Hernandez “ruled correctly” in the Cox case. But he also acknowledges that the ruling was based on his “textual interpretation” and that “pre-Internet law needs updating.”
Youm offers a wake-up call to state legislators. Media shield laws must be revised to make clear that bloggers and all citizen-journalists deserve the same protection as the city hall beat-writer at the local newspaper.
This is especially important, as technology and new economic realities have forced newspapers all over the country to cut staff drastically and in many cases, close up shop. The public now relies on citizen-journalists to perform an invaluable service to our democracy — serving as government watchdogs.
Attribution:
First Amendment protects bloggers, too
Jason Stverak
February 18, 2012
The Washington Examiner
http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2012/02/first-amendment-protects-bloggers-too/280586"

Source of Post and Where to Sign Petition
 http://www.estateofdenial.com/2012/02/23/help-protect-your-voice-strengthen-citizen-journalists-blogger-rights/

Read more...

David Carr of the New York Times pretending to do investigative reporting, yet David Carr LIES, turns victims into criminals. And my Guess is the Philadelphia Media Network CEO Greg Osberg story is not Different. David Carr is a PROVEN Liar, and has No accountability for his LIES.

Friday, February 17, 2012

This is Ridiculous, you Shouldn't Lie to David Carr, what a Crock of Shit that Is.

David Carr Flat Out Lies, Sides with Criminals, Does not have one objective part in his stories and my guess is that David Carr is on the wrong side of the law and the WRONG side of the Moral Compass in this one as well.

David Carr is the Pencil Neck on the Left
I will Soon Sue David Carr for Defamation and So Should Greg Osberg. As David Carr spoke to me, and knew the other side to the story, and though I already was served up a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement and plenty of hate, David Carr of the New York Times served me up some more by deliberately defaming me, all to protect corporate greed and the abuse of government programs at the taxpayers expense.  Why trash an investigative blogger doing what he does, talking to sources and posting a story?

I guess David Carr does not have much stomach for investigative bloggers as David Carr does not have a clue how to investigate a story and David Carr simply listens to the yammers of alleged spineless, ball-less, nameless sources instead of reading documents, reading contracts and looking at the real proof of the story that does not come from the mouth of the SIDE that Dave Carr of the New York Times Decides to take.


Below is from the Jim Romenesko Blog - The Title Really Got me as David Carr is a Liar, I told David Carr the TRUTH and he Printed the LIE. So it does not matter what you tell David Carr of the New York Times, David Carr will twist the TRUTH, the Documented Facts to support his own lying agenda and to keep the wall of corruption firmly in place.

Here is the Article:

"YOU SHOULDN’T LIE TO DAVID CARR AND NYT"

"....Amy Chozick and David Carr’s New York Times story on the Philadelphia newspapers saga.

New York Times reporters David Carr and Amy Chozick started working on their Philadelphia newspapers story on Sunday, and heard “persistent reports” of a meeting taking place during which Philadelphia Media Network CEO Greg Osberg told editors that he’d be overseeing articles about the impending sale of the Inquirer and Daily News."

"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct and he was also trying to keep his boss’s exposure sort of at a minimum. I knew Osberg from his time at Newsweek and had always had good dealings with him. I heard some bad things [from Philadelphia sources], but I had an open mind about talking with him.”
David Carr, New York Times

By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story. “So that was one of my first questions [to Osberg]: ‘Did you hold the meeting with the three editors?’ and he said no. I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”

Again, Osberg denied there was meeting.

Just before ending the interview, Carr gave Osberg yet another opportunity to admit that the meeting took place. He wouldn’t do it.

Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”

"Later Wednesday afternoon, Philadelphia Daily News editor Larry Platt said on the record that the meeting took place. “He wouldn’t go into details,” says Carr, “but those we already had.”

Carr then told Block in an email that Platt confirmed the meeting that Osberg said never took place.

“He said, ‘What time are you closing?’ I said 7:30, and so at 7:50 he sent me a 200-word statement from Osberg acknowledging that the meeting had taken place.”

Here is Osberg’s statement to the Times reporters, time-stamped 7:56 p.m.:

I made it very clear in this February 7 meeting, that I was not suggesting ever taking control of the editorial process, nor was I planning to change any reporting policies going forward. Any suggestions to the contrary of that position are categorically denied, as I stated to you during our interview this morning.

What I did tell the editors that attended this meeting is that I would like to be advised before any articles are published on the subject of Philadelphia Media Network’s possible sale, so that as Publisher, I would not be blind-sided by a story publicly, without receiving advance notice. In view of the sensitive subject matter of the sale, as Publisher, I would have the prerogative to make such a request and it would not be uncommon to receive such notification.

Carr called the desk — after his deadline — and told editors about the statement. They were able to add a sentence to the story.

“It made me angry,” says the reporter. “I don’t know if I’ve ever been through something like that before: No, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; and then, yes it did.”

“I was angry.”

Source of David Carr Gibberish.
http://jimromenesko.com/2012/02/16/you-shouldnt-lie-to-david-carr-and-nyt/


David Carr was angry? Who gives a Shit?

I show 3 years of possible corruption and David Carr is so blind to the real story that he does not investigate any part of it and instead discriminates against a female blogger whom was exposing corruption in the US bankruptcy courtsDavid Carr has no right to say I am angry, and all the other cock and bull David Carr is blathering as news.  I am the One who should be angry and so should the other victims of David Carr's Lies. As he has ruined lives with no remorse and acts angry over this, what a crock. David Carr does NOT investigate a story and David Carr listens to the yammer of sources such as liar Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group and his attorney David Aman of Tonkon Torp BOTH of whom were involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal. Which David Carr did not even bother to look into.

David Carr, "heard “persistent reports” What? that sure sounds full of shit, I gave David Carr leads to documented proof on my story. David Carr of the New York Times Sure seems to believe the scuddle, the persistent voices of non-authority over documented proof. David Carr of the New York Times is an idiot at best.  

David Carr Bullshit Regarding the Greg Osberg Scandal
"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct" Says the Article above, what a Crock this is .. David Carr spins and spins and turns victims into criminals with out ANY reading of documented facts.  David Carr is so full of shit, I was "helpful and direct" and honest, and David Carr of the New York Times Flat out Lied about me. David Carr is a classic case of you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. As David Carr is shown proof, documentation and still goes with the LIE over the Documented Evidence.

"By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story.." Again what a bunch of bullshit, multiple "sources", I gave David Carr leads to documented proof and David Carr uses the blathering of alleged facts from the mouths of supposed "multiple sources" to ruin this guys reputation, and in the name of what? protecting whom?

The article goes on to say "I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”", I say what a Fuck Head David Carr is, one chance to amend your answer, then he will ruin your life with no proof.  David Carr is a lying asshole, with agendas that are NOT of the Public Interest. Do not ever TRUST getting your news from the LIES of David Carr.

*"Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”"

Gossip and Blather, that's news to the Lying alleged "Journalist" David Carr of the New York Times, office clatter is NEWS to ex druggies like David Carr who cannot read documented proof.  David Carr relies on gossip and word of mouth for his story, and David Carr refuses to READ and investigate FACTS.

Documentation, Depositions, Videos, Contracts, Tax Information, and more were available regarding the Truth about Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, but instead of looking into the story David Carr of the New York Times simply trashed me, lied about me and though word, documented word was all over the WORLD regarding Kevin Padrick, David Carr simply took his side over Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and chose to defame her, me, without investigating easy to read documented proof.

David Carr flat out LIED saying that there was no one else who had issue with Obsidian Finance Group or Kevin Padrick and that seems to be protected by Law. I expose real corruption and tell the TRUTH and am not protected by Law as media, but David Carr of the New York Times, flat out lies, KNOWINGLY about me, Crystal Cox Blogger and there is no protection for me, as the Law protects the LIES of David Carr. Gee.. um I snorted to much cocaine and really believed my source.. your honor.. wa la no accountability for Dipshit David Carr to ruin lives, careers and run amok.

Let's See one of the worlds biggest Law Firms, a Billion Dollar Solar and Finance company sues a penniless blogger and Dumb Ass David Carr does not look into the Financial Companies and Lawyers but instead lets my clients, family, friends and the world believe I am an extortionist, that I attacked an innocent many with the power of my blogs and David Carr lied flat out claiming he looked into it and there was no other issues with this man, Kevin Padrick. All flat out lies, meanwhile EVIL David Carr is using the power of his voice at the New York Times to to ruin lives, families, careers, quality of life, credibility and without really reading documents or studying anything but simply listening the yammer across is phone heard through the woman hating, prejudices, discriminated, biased ears of New York Times Ignorant Reporter David Carr.

See David Carr took the Word Of Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group. David Carr interviewed me himself and did not print my side. This article talks of several sources that told David Carr of a secret meeting? Does Dave Carr of the NYT's have to name all these sources? See I had 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts and more and David Carr of the New York Times took this Evidence and told his readers that there was no reason for what I wrote about Kevin Padrick. David Carr defamed me, on purpose, after talking to me. With 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts available online, David Carr flat out lied to protect Kevin Padrick by saying the Truth Wins, and saying there was no one else with issue with Kevin Padrick when you can easily read that there is plenty of documentation to prove that my story had 3 years worth of merit.

DO not Trust David Carr of the New York Times and his Secret Sources, as David Carr Flat Out Lies to protect criminals and has no investigative skills.

David Carr of the New York Times talked about my writings on my home town of Lincoln County Montana, and my Montana corruption writings and instead of looking into a massive wall of corruption in Montana that involves the top politicians and drug companies in the world, David Carr simply slammed an investigative blogger reporting on the story.

David Carr trash talks my writings exposing Proskauer Rose Law Firm and Ex Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye yet David Carr does not look into massive amounts of documented proof.

David Carr trash talks my stories of Time Warner CEO Jeffrey Bewkes and of CEO of Intel Paul Otellini yet David Car refuses to investigated the documented proof.


I have not dug into the Greg Osberg story as I am swamped right now. However, I am betting that David Carr is the Asshole in this one.  Seems like a petty story, that is regarding the career of David Carr and personal issues to me. Yet David Carr ignores a story such as the many I write on that affect the public at large in a very real way.

Do you have a tip on the David Carr smackdown of Greg Osberg? What is the Truth about Greg Osberg, my guess is the Truth is the Exact opposite of what lying asshole David Carr suggest. As I personally told David Carr the TRUTH in my case and David Carr lied to the world about me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. David Carr of the New York Times used his power, not for the good to investigate corruption in the New York Courts that I Blog about, not write on the SEC Corruption I post on, not to investigate the massively corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm or the whitewashing in the New York Justice System, not to Investigate the iViewit Stolen Technology, nor to look into the real story of Lightsquared, Philip Falcone and those who set him up to keep Clearwire and Verizon in Business.

See David Carr of the New York Times is a Spineless, Ball-Less Ex Cocaine Head, who cannot think for himself and instead let's big money tell him what to say.  David Carr of the New York Times does not have the authority to speak the Truth, for David Carr of the New York Times is a whipping boy for big media and to protect the wall of corruption that big media like the New York Time protects.

I, Crystal Cox Blogger am TRULY independent, I get tips daily because I am very good at search engine placement. I read documents and investigate stories in a way that Spineless, Asshole David Carr of the New York Times simply cannot because he has a BOSS, he has Ad Dollars, Politics and Big Media to Answer to and I answer to NO One.

Expose the Lying, Life Ruining Weasel David Carr - Email me all the DIRT, documents, videos and indescresions. As David Carr of the New York Times, thinks it prudent to lie about me, defame me and make me look like a criminal when really I am the voice for the victims of big corporations, bankruptcy courts, corrupt judge and lawyers and I am the REAL Independent, NOT bought and Paid for Media that tells more of the truth than David Carr dare to.

David Carr of the New York Times is weak and rely's on bad information and his own Ego to write his stories and posts no proof of documents or "Reality". Do NOT ever Trust a Story from Dave Carr - David Carr of the New York Times.


Dipshit David Carr lied about the WRONG Investigative Blogger. And now the Obsidian V. Cox LIES and blathers of David Carr of the New York Times will be his Online Legacy.

David Carr of the New York Times answers to Big Media and David Carr of the New York Times does not tell you the truth, the whole TRUTH and Nothing But. David Carr of the New York Times uses his power to ruin lives instead of truly investigate stories and make the world a better place for the greater good. David Carr of the New York Times lies about me, defamed me, trash talked me and FAILED to investigate the document proof of my 3 year old story.  I will EXPOSE every indiscrestion of David Carr of the New York Times, every late night romp, every video and document I receive, every secret that David Carr of the New York Times wants to hide, I will make sure that this information is found in the search engines.

Got a David Carr of the New York Times story, video, or any information .. DIRT on David Carr of the New York Times ? Email it to Me, I am Blogger Crystal Cox and I will EXPOSE David Carr no matter what, even if the Liars, Thugs and Thieves murder me, I still have bloggers in place to take over where I leave off and EXPOSE every dirty trick, dirty deed, perverted thought, illegal action, and well pretty much EVERY Single Thing regarding David Carr of the New York Times.

Defame Me, Lie About Me, Discredit me to my family, friends, and the world and the truth is I give voice to victims, expose whitewashing for elite law firms, expose bankruptcy courts, expose judges and those who create victims and David Carr of the New York Times sides with the wall of corruption and without investigative any documents of evidence.

Research links on documented Proof of Corruption involving Intel Corp., Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Foley and Lardner Law Firm including Michael Grebe, USPTO Corruption, New York Court Corruption, Warner Bros. Corruption, Lockheed Martin Corruption, CEO Jeffrey Bewkes, CEO Paul Otellini, MPEG LA  and more tech companies, media companies, and law firms as well as US courts in the stealing of a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology ~ the iViewit Technology.

David Carr of the New York Times cannot read and his brain was gone long ago with all the Cocaine he snorted, so you will have to research the stories yourself, instead of simply believing me bad, wrong, defaming or in some way harming the innocent. Think for Yourself and DO NOT believe David Carr of the New York Times.

Over 1200 documents of Proof and Dumb Ass David Carr of the New York Times simply states that Blogger Crystal Cox is defaming and there you have it, no research, no documents linked or proven just the word of a cocaine head, woman hating, blogger hating "alleged" journalist ...

Do your Homework.


http://www.deniedpatent.com/


http://iviewit.tv/


http://www.josephleccese.com/


http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/


http://www.alexisdevane.com/


http://www.paulotellini.info/


http://intelcorruption.blogspot.com/


http://www.douglaschey.com/


David Carr of the New York Times flat out lies to protect Elite Lawyers, New York Corruption, and Big Media. David Carr is part of the PROBLEM and not the SOLUTION in the Culture of Corruption.

Got a Dipshit David Carr Tip, Email your David Carr tip to investigative blogger Crystal L. Cox - Crystal@CrystalCox.com .

EXPOSE David Carr of the New York Times - I am Dedicated to exposing David Carr of the New York Times, please email me your tips regarding David Carr of the New York Times.

David Carr of the New York Times has made and ENEMY for Life, in Me, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, by not bothering to Investigate a story and ruining lives with total disregard for the facts of the matter, and with complete lack of accountability.

David Carr of the New York Times is an asshole, indeed and David Carr of the New York Times has the power to of big Corrupt Media behind him with total disregard for the public at large and bringing down the wall of corruption in the US court system that protects big corporations, elite lawyers and liars like Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.

Do your Homework, Think For Yourself, Believe NO One.
READ, Study, find the TRUTH for yourself.

NEVER listen to 
David Carr of the New York Times. 


Read more...

"FDA officials could be breaking the law by retaliating against the whistleblowers," "Who authorized the monitoring of the whistleblowers"

Thursday, February 2, 2012

I am not sure what to think of Grassley's seeming attack on Lightsquared and what looks like siding with good ol boys Verizon, AT&;T, Clearwire, Deere and Company.. thing is, this Calling out the FDA, calling out a government agency for retaliation against Whistleblower's is indeed something to be respected, commended.

I often ask the same question, as in the SEC, the Department of Justice, the FBI, Corrupt Montana Courts, Corruption in the Supreme Court, Corrupt Judges and other Government Agencies, indeed "Who authorized the monitoring of the whistleblowers" and who gives the orders to retaliate against a whistle blower?

"Grassley probes FDA over whistleblower retaliation
By Julian Pecquet - 02/02/12 12:31 PM ET

The senior Republican on the Judiciary Committee is demanding answers from the Obama administration over the Food and Drug Administration's retaliation against whistleblowers who contacted his office.

Six current and former FDA employees sued the government last week alleging that the agency pried into their personal email accounts and retaliated against them after they shared with Congress concerns about the approval process for medical devices.

Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), a longtime champion of whistleblower rights, on Thursday released a letter that warns that FDA officials could be breaking the law by retaliating against the whistleblowers, at least one of whom was fired.

"It is troubling to me to see your Agency actively pursue the dismissal of an employee … not because they violated procedure and leaked genuinely confidential classified information, but simply because you 'cannot trust him'," Grassley wrote to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg. "During your confirmation hearing in the Senate in 2009 you stated, 'I think whistleblowers serve a very important role in government in surfacing critical issues and concerns and making sure they're addressed. As leader of the FDA, I would very much want to create a culture that enables all voices to be heard'"

Source and Full Article
http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/medical-devices-and-prescription-drug-policy-/208287-grassley-probes-fda-over-whistleblower-retaliation

As with the Peter Sivere Story, and so many others I hear of where whistleblowers are retaliated against by governement agencies, this is a major statement and a win for whistleblowers everywhere.

Read more...

MPEG LA, Greenberg Traurig, Proskauer Rose, Foley and Lardner, Intel Corp, Warner Bros., Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Technolgies, Foley and Lardner, Massive Shareholder Fraud

Friday, November 11, 2011

the Iviewit Technology Story - Proskauer Rose, MPEG LA, Greenberg Traurig


The iViewit Technologies Story involves some of the biggest tech, media, law firms in the world, Click Below for more on the iViewit Technology Story.

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf

http://www.dougchey.com/

http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/

Read more...

SEC gets Tips and Rats Out Whistleblower. Peter Siver - George Demos, still Ignored by SEC.

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

"As the SEC Finalizes Its Whistleblower Rules, One Whistleblower's Fight for Justice Continues

By MICHAEL SMALLBERG and ADAM ZAGORIN

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently approved final rules to implement a vastly improved whistleblower award program mandated by the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation.

Under this legislation and the final rules, the SEC generally cannot "disclose information that could reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of a whistleblower."

If the program has any chance of succeeding, whistleblowers must have confidence in the SEC’s ability to protect their confidentiality. Just ask Peter Sivere.

Last year, we wrote in Politics Daily about Sivere’s experience when he came to the SEC in 2004 with what he described as "confidential" evidence of wrongdoing by his employer, JPMorgan Chase. He received a response from George Demos, an enforcement attorney in the SEC’s New York office, who assured Sivere that the SEC’s investigation would be kept confidential.

However, Demos turned around and disclosed non-public information about Sivere to JPMorgan’s counsel, who then used the information to attack Sivere’s whistleblower credentials, according to a 2009 investigative report issued by the SEC Office of Inspector General (OIG). (Although Demos’s name was redacted in the report, documents obtained by POGO confirmed that he was the attorney cited in the OIG’s investigation.)

The OIG recommended that the SEC consider taking disciplinary action against Demos, but no action was taken, as confirmed by a recent letter sent from SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro to House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) that included an update on the SEC’s response to OIG disciplinary recommendations. In fact, Demos left the SEC and announced that he was running for Congress, touting his service as an SEC enforcement attorney.

The SEC may have let Demos off the hook, but Sivere has pressed on in his fight to hold Demos accountable. He recently filed a complaint before a New York state judicial body alleging that Demos violated the rules of professional conduct for New York attorneys. In May 2010, the Grievance Committee for the State of New York’s Tenth Judicial District told Sivere it had dismissed the complaint against Demos, but it was unclear whether a credible investigation had ever been conducted.

This morning, Larry Doyle at Sense on Cents posted a letter from the Clerk of the New York State Supreme Court stating that the investigation has now been re-opened and transferred to a different department. The letter, dated June 1, 2011, states that "[t]he investigation was initially disposed of by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, but upon further review, it was decided that the matter should be re-opened but transferred to another department....in order to avoid the appearance of impropriety."

We hope that a thorough investigation will finally be conducted into the allegations that Demos disclosed non-public information about Sivere. In the meantime, as the SEC tries to convince more whistleblowers to come forward with information on securities law violations, it is imperative that SEC officials hold employees accountable for violating the rules of the whistleblower award program. As Sivere remarked in a public comment on the SEC’s initial proposed rules, "those entrusted with investigating tips of potential fraud from whistle blowers must have the fortitude to do the right thing, not the easy thing."

Michael Smallberg is a POGO Investigator. Adam Zagorin is POGO's Journalist in Residence. "

Peter Sivere Post Source

Read more...

The Corrupt JP Morgan Chase - "second department grievance committee" -

Tuesday, February 15, 2011


JP Morgan Chase Today Googling "second department grievance committee" - they are not much interested in this Site, to much TRUTH about the Corruption of JP Morgan .

So why is George Demos Cronies, JP Morgan Chase Today Googling "second department grievance committee" ? JP Morgan Chase used the Second Department Greivance Committee new York to Hide Massive Corruption in JP Morgan by Protecting Corrupt SEC Investigator George Demos and Exposing then JP Morgan Comptroller Peter Sivere.

So What is JP Morgan Chase up to Today Googling "second department grievance committee" ? Got a Tip? Crystal@CrystalCox.com - Coming Soon much more on Who at JP Morgan Chase is in bed with the Second Department, and who actually ratted out Peter Sivere Whistleblower to PROCTED over 300 Million in Mortgage Fraud withing JP Morgan.

more on this Story

Read more...

Collier Halpern Newberg Nolletti and Bock

Collier Halpern Newberg Nolletti & Bock - LOVE every Word on this Site. Got a tip on Collier Halpern Newberg Nolletti and Bock ? eMail me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Read more...
Owned by Crystal L. Cox

Blog Archive

  © Blogger template On The Road by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Back to TOP